Before I begin my reading response, I must admit that I know little
about 19th C American theater techniques or Cooper’s feelings
towards the stage. With this disclaimer in mind, last week’s discussion about
the Gothic-window passage popped into my mind when I was reading an unrelated
article on theatrical techniques. The Gothic-window reads:
Standing on the hill-side within
the woods, we looked down beneath an archway of green branches, and between
noble living columns of pine and hemlock, upon the blue waters below, as though
we were gazing at them through the elaborate mouldings of a great Gothic
window—a fine frame for any picture. (21)
Cooper views the lake through the natural frame of pine and
hemlock branches, but likens the arch of tree branches to a Gothic window.
Professor Irmscher pointed out that this visual technique is often used in
Books of Hours. On the illustration page, one often finds a religious scene
depicted as if the reader were looking through a cathedral window. As a class
we posited that Cooper was either emulating this artistic technique in her
narrative or was using man-made elements through which to shape the reader’s
perceptions of nature. However, it should be noted that the scenes Cooper
depicts are not static or frozen scenes like those of an illustration, but
instead lively and animated scenes (an affect afforded by the narrative form
Cooper decides to use).
This point is further emphasized later on in the “Autumn”
chapter when she depicts a moving scene. She writes:
In our walk this morning, observed
a large stone farmhouse, with maples grouped about in most brilliant color; a
party of men were husking maize in the foreground; a group of cows grazing, in
one direction, and a cart with a pile of noble pumpkins lying in the other. It
would have made a good picture of an American autumn scene. (215)
Even though Cooper notes that the scene she describes in
this passage would make a good “picture,” there is a distinct difference
between this narrative and a potential painting. The beauty of the scene lies
in its dynamic movement: the men “husking” corn; the cows “gazing,” and the
pumpkins “lying” as if in rest. Unlike an unchanging illustration that merely implies
movement, the scenes Cooper’s narrative renders is in constant flux.
I want to offer the alternate suggestion that in these
repeated moments of framing scenes as if through windows or as works of art,
Cooper appropriates the theatrical technique of “discovery.” I believe that the
similarities are significant and the aesthetic technique of discovery nicely
aligns with Cooper’s eco-critical message. To provide a brief explanation, discovery
is defined as the space revealed by the opening or closing of shutters on a
stage. Discovery revolutionized the scenic stage because it allowed for
fluidity of control over scene changes. The shutters, often constructed at
multiple depths on the stage, could be pulled open to reveal or pushed closed
to hide multiple discovery areas. In other words, the nature that Cooper
depicts is not an illustration or a window, but instead a scenic stage.
Cooper uses the visual effects of performance to affect
audience perception as well as audience comprehension of her eco-critical
message. More specifically, Cooper employs the theatrical technique of
discovery in order to differentiate her narrative’s location from the known
natural areas around Cooperstown so as to prevent her readers from reducing the
scenery to mere territory or owned property. Note also that Cooper removes the
names of common land markers such as Mount ---. Cooper functions as our eyes to
the natural world around her, making sight a prominent theme in the text. She
is able to reveal or obscure the discovery areas of Cooperstown, either
providing the reader sight of the natural landscape or blindness in much the
same way as the shutters function on the scenic stage to reveal or hide certain
discovery areas.
The Gothic window passage and others like it are moments of
discovery in which Cooper decides to move the reader from a state of blindness
to a state of sight. Coopers use of discovery often helps to illustrate a world
in which the true way of seeing (i.e. Cooper’s way of seeing) the land is
concealed and its eventual revelation is rendered more spectacular, as if
framed by a Gothic window. This manufactured revelation allows Cooper to guide
the reader through her narrative to reach the rhetorical conclusion of her
text. Cooper wants the reader to see the landscape as a place of activity,
interaction, and change, rather than as the location for passive contemplation
or possessive ownership. Nature is something that should be actively preserved instead
of possessed, contained, and destroyed.
I think this is a fantastic reading of this passage and a model blog post--beginning with an interesting, even counter-intuitive idea (Cooper and the stage), exemplifying it by way of textual evidence, and then moving on to formulate a more general idea (about Cooper's animus against landowners). What remains unexplained so far is the transition to painting ("Mr. Cole") that follows right afterwards, which suggests that she had painting in mind, unless we assume that Cooper is being deliberately misleading here. Which, in this elusive book, is a distinct possibility.
ReplyDeleteI agree about the complications produced by transition to painting. In retrospect, I think a better passage to highlight the theatrical elements is the moon passage in the very first "Autumn" entry.
ReplyDelete